Posted by: r.m. | March 18, 2009

saying No to Nestle

In addition to the beautiful massive victory in El Salvador, there are also these small – but powerfully important – successful acts of resistance and victories. Resistance against theft and economic oppression and commodification.  And all the better when it is against a Zionist, ethically-vile, environmentally-destructive company

Another town says no to Nestlé

NEWFIELD, Maine–Residents here voted March 14 for a rights-based water extraction ordinance that effectively prohibits Nestlé Corp., owner of the Poland Springs label, from extracting groundwater to fill their water bottles. The vote passed 228 to 146.

Two weeks ago, citizens in the nearby town of Shapleigh also voted to approve the same type of ordinance, which rejected what some consider a corporate assault by the largest food and beverage conglomerate in the world. The ordinance affirms the right to self-government at the municipal level by requiring that corporate entities wishing to conduct business in the municipality defer to the will of the people. Essentially, the new law strips corporations of their status of “personhood,” which they obtained in 1886 by a judge’s ruling, thus also denying them the right to challenge or nullify the ordinance–a strategy that countless corporations have used to dilute or block pro-environment and other pro-worker measures.

The battle to take local control of groundwater resources began last year when resident Ann Wentworth was hiking in the Vernon Walker Wildlife Preserve and discovered that the Nestlé had (illegally) drilled “test wells” without notifying the townspeople. The wildlife preserve had been given to the state of Maine with the condition that it was to be preserved as part of “the commons” for residents of Shapleigh and Newfield to enjoy in perpetuity. Nowhere in the preserve’s charter did it say that the state of Maine could sell the water to a corporation.

Maine is one of only two states that have the “Absolute Dominion” law, which says that what is under the ground belongs to the property owner. The state of Maine is supposed to act as a trustee and steward of the land for the residents. Coincidently, the brother of Maine Gov. John Baldacci worked as an attorney for Nestlé/Poland Springs bottling company, until a public outcry “encouraged” him to resign.

The entanglement of the state and Nestlé is not new, but what is new is that activists and citizens alike have thrown down the gauntlet and declared, “Water is for life and not for profit.”

To quote Maude Barlow, the UN Advisor on Water and author of the book Blue Gold, “Under the current model of globalization, everything is for sale. Areas once considered our common heritage are being commodified, commercialized and privatized at an alarming rate. The assault on, and defense of, the commons is one of the great ideological social struggles of our times.”


Responses

  1. well from one perspective, the people are right, water should be for life and not profit. However, personally I like Nestle and its products , especially chocolates like Kitkat and Lion… and since taking the water would not impact the environment negatively, I don’t see why Nestle can’t take the water.

  2. ok, i cant decide to be with or against nestle ( since ther chocolate is outstanding)… till at least i understand what does “personhood” status means ???? but secretly drilling illegal test wells is rather fishy…


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Categories

%d bloggers like this: